Ford Fiesta 2012 vs Volkswagen Polo 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Fiesta is more dynamic to drive. Ford Fiesta engine produces 20 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Ford Fiesta reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.5 | |
|
The Ford Fiesta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Fiesta consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Ford Fiesta over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Fiesta is 6 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Fiesta is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 460 litres | |
| Ford Fiesta has 5 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`125 | 1`660 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Fiesta, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fiesta has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |