Ford Fiesta 2005 vs Mazda 2 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Fiesta engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Mazda 2. Due to the lower power, Ford Fiesta reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Fiesta consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Ford Fiesta over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Fiesta consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.53 m | |
| Ford Fiesta and Mazda 2 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 284 litres | 268 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1044 litres | |
| Ford Fiesta has 16 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`490 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fiesta has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fiesta has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |