Ford Fiesta 2012 vs Mazda 2 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Fiesta and Mazda 2 have the same engine power, but Ford Fiesta torque is 5 NM less than Mazda 2. Ford Fiesta reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.3 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Fiesta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Fiesta consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Ford Fiesta over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Fiesta consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Fiesta is 5 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 295 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 787 litres | |
|
Ford Fiesta has more luggage capacity. Ford Fiesta has 46 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fiesta is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`540 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Fiesta is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Fiesta scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fiesta has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fiesta has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |