Ford Fiesta 2017 vs Mazda 2 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Fiesta is more dynamic to drive. Ford Fiesta engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Ford Fiesta reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 | 3.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 4.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Fiesta consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Fiesta could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Fiesta consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Fiesta is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Fiesta is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 303 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
984 litres | 950 litres | |
|
Ford Fiesta has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda 2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fiesta (by 34 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fiesta is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Ford Fiesta can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`670 kg | 1`575 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`132 kg | 1`040 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 538 kg | 535 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 2 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda 2 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fiesta has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |