Ford Fiesta 2017 vs Mazda 2 2015

 
Ford Fiesta
2017 - 2020
Mazda 2
2015 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 85 HP90 HP
Torque: 215 NM148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds9.4 seconds
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Fiesta engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 2, but torque is 67 NM more than Mazda 2. Due to the lower power, Ford Fiesta reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.54.5
Real fuel consumption: 4.5 l/100km5.5 l/100km
The Ford Fiesta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Fiesta consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Ford Fiesta over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Fiesta consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2.
Fuel tank capacity: 42 litres43 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1200 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle
1310 km on highway1160 km on highway
930 km with real consumption780 km with real consumption
Ford Fiesta gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.06 m
Width: 1.73 m1.70 m
Height: 1.48 m1.50 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Fiesta is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Fiesta is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 303 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
984 litres950 litres
Ford Fiesta has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Ford Fiesta has 23 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The Mazda 2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fiesta (by 34 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters9.4 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Fiesta is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Ford Fiesta can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6701`505
Safety:
Mazda 2 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda 2 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 12 4009600
Pros and Cons: Ford Fiesta has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Mazda 2 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv