Ford Fiesta 2017 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Ford Fiesta engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Ford Fiesta reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Fiesta consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Fiesta could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Fiesta consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Fiesta is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Fiesta is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 303 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
984 litres | no data | |
| Ford Fiesta has 3 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fiesta is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Ford Fiesta can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`588 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Clio scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Clio has
| |