Ford Fiesta 1999 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Fiesta
1999 - 2002
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.81.2 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 60 - 105 HP55 - 100 HP
Torque: 103 - 145 NM106 - 240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 - 16.4 seconds10.7 - 17.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.3 - 7.34.5 - 7.4
Ford Fiesta petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Ford Fiesta equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.83 m3.90 m
Width: 1.63 m1.65 m
Height: 1.32 m1.46 m
Ford Fiesta is smaller.
Ford Fiesta is 7 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Fiesta is 14 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
930 litres1030 litres
Ford Fiesta has 20 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 100 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Fiesta is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Ford Fiesta can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`468~ 1`530
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 12001400
Pros and Cons: Ford Fiesta has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv