Ford Fiesta 1999 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.8 | 1.0 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 105 HP | 45 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 - 145 NM | 76 - 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 16.4 seconds | 10.5 - 21.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 7.3 | 4.7 - 8.6 | |
|
On average, the Ford Fiesta petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Volkswagen Polo. On average, Ford Fiesta equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.42 m | |
| Ford Fiesta is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Fiesta is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | 975 litres | |
| Ford Fiesta has 5 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 45 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fiesta is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Ford Fiesta can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`468 | ~ 1`401 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fiesta has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |