Ford Fiesta 1999 vs Nissan Micra 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.8 | 1.0 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 105 HP | 57 - 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 - 145 NM | 80 - 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 16.4 seconds | 11.9 - 18.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 7.3 | 5.2 - 6.4 | |
|
Ford Fiesta petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. On average, Ford Fiesta equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Ford Fiesta is larger, but lower. Ford Fiesta is 8 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Fiesta is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 206 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | 960 litres | |
| Ford Fiesta has 44 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 30 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fiesta is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`468 | ~ 1`358 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fiesta has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |