Ford Fiesta 2003 vs Renault Clio 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 60 - 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 - 204 NM | 93 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 15.8 seconds | 6.9 - 15.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.5 | 4.3 - 8.4 | |
|
Ford Fiesta petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Ford Fiesta equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Fiesta is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 268 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
945 litres | 1038 litres | |
| Ford Fiesta has 20 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 93 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fiesta is 1.5 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Ford Fiesta can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`538 | ~ 1`653 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fiesta has
|
Renault Clio has
| |