Ford Fiesta 2003 vs Mazda 2 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 - 204 NM | 110 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 15.8 seconds | 11.4 - 16 seconds | |
| In general, Ford Fiesta are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda 2. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.5 | 4.5 - 7.1 | |
|
Ford Fiesta petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. On average, Ford Fiesta equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.54 m | |
| Ford Fiesta and Mazda 2 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 268 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
945 litres | 1044 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`538 kg | ~ 1`512 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`044 kg | ~ 1`070 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 494 kg | ~ 442 kg | |
| Ford Fiesta load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Mazda 2. Therefore, Ford Fiesta is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fiesta has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |