Ford Fiesta 2012 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 65 - 125 HP | 60 - 105 HP | |
Torque: | 150 - 200 NM | 108 - 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 16.8 seconds | 10.4 - 16.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.3 - 5.9 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
Ford Fiesta petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Ford Fiesta equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.95 m | 3.97 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
Ford Fiesta is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 295 litres | 280 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Ford Fiesta has 15 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The Volkswagen Polo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Fiesta is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Ford Fiesta can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`506 | ~ 1`570 | |
Safety: | |||
Ford Fiesta scores higher in safety tests. | |||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fiesta has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |