Ford Fiesta 2012 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Fiesta
2012 - 2017
Volkswagen Polo
2009 - 2014
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 1.61.2 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 65 - 125 HP60 - 105 HP
Torque: 150 - 200 NM108 - 230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 - 16.8 seconds10.4 - 16.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.3 - 5.94.2 - 5.9
Ford Fiesta petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Ford Fiesta equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.95 m3.97 m
Width: 1.72 m1.68 m
Height: 1.48 m1.49 m
Ford Fiesta is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 295 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data952 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Ford Fiesta has 15 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The Volkswagen Polo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Fiesta is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Ford Fiesta can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`506~ 1`570
Safety:
Ford Fiesta scores higher in safety tests.
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 46004000
Pros and Cons: Ford Fiesta has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
Volkswagen Polo has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv