Ford Fiesta 2012 vs Renault Clio 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 0.9 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 125 HP | 90 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 200 NM | 135 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 16.8 seconds | 6.7 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.3 - 5.9 | 3.2 - 6.3 | |
|
Ford Fiesta petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Ford Fiesta equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Ford Fiesta is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Fiesta is 12 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Fiesta is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 295 litres | 300 litres | |
| Ford Fiesta has 5 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fiesta is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Ford Fiesta can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`506 | ~ 1`653 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Clio scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fiesta has
|
Renault Clio has
| |