Ford Escort 1997 vs Toyota Celica 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Ford Escort engine produces 85 HP less power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Ford Escort reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Ford Mondeo | Used also on Toyota Carina E | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.33 m | |
|
Ford Escort is smaller, but higher. Ford Escort is 36 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Escort is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escort is 1 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Ford Escort can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escort has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |