Ford Escort 1996 vs Toyota Celica 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Ford Escort engine produces 85 HP less power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Ford Escort reaches 100 km/h speed 6.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.9 | |
|
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escort consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Ford Escort over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Escort gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.33 m | |
|
Ford Escort is smaller, but higher. Ford Escort is 36 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Escort is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escort is 1 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Ford Escort can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 850 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escort has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |