Ford Escort 1995 vs Chrysler Neon 1997
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 133 HP | |
Torque: | 134 NM | 174 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Chrysler Neon is a more dynamic driving. Ford Escort engine produces 43 HP less power than Chrysler Neon, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Chrysler Neon. Due to the lower power, Ford Escort reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Escort consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that by driving the Ford Escort over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Escort consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 47 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
680 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Escort gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.29 m | 4.36 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.35 m | 1.37 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Escort is 7 cm shorter than the Chrysler Neon, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Escort is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Escort is 0.8 metres less than that of the Chrysler Neon, which means Ford Escort can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escort has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |