Ford Escort 1993 vs Audi 80 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 110 NM | 150 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.6 seconds | 16.3 seconds | |
Audi 80 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Escort engine produces 15 HP less power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Audi 80. Due to the lower power, Ford Escort reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.6 | |
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escort consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the Ford Escort over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.27 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.35 m | 1.41 m | |
Ford Escort is smaller. Ford Escort is 21 cm shorter than the Audi 80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Escort is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 650 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Escort is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Ford Escort can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 950 | 1`860 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | below average | |
Audi 80 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Escort has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escort has
|
Audi 80 has
| |