Ford Escort 1992 vs BMW 5 series 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Ford Escort engine produces 60 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 56 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Ford Escort reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Escort consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Ford Escort over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Escort consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Escort) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 5 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 5 series engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on BMW 3 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Escort is smaller. Ford Escort is 45 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Escort is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 910 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escort is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Ford Escort can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 850 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| BMW 5 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Escort has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than BMW 5 series, so BMW 5 series quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escort has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |