Ford Escort 1992 vs Audi 80 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 134 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
Ford Escort and Audi 80 have the same engine power, but Ford Escort torque is 14 NM less than Audi 80. Ford Escort reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Escort consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the Ford Escort over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Escort consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
690 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 500'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi 80 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 3 years | 5 years | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.27 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.35 m | 1.41 m | |
Ford Escort is smaller. Ford Escort is 21 cm shorter than the Audi 80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Escort is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1200 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Escort is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Ford Escort can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 850 | 1`780 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | below average | |
Audi 80 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Escort has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1800 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escort has
|
Audi 80 has
| |