Ford Escort 1992 vs Ford Escort 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Ford Escort 1992 engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Escort 1995, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Escort 1995 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Escort 1992 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort 1995, which means that by driving the Ford Escort 1992 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Escort 1992 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort 1995. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.35 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Escort 1992 is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Escort 1995, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escort 1992 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Escort 1995, which means Ford Escort 1992 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Escort has
| |