Ford Escort 1992 vs Toyota Starlet 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 54 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 91 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
| Ford Escort engine produces 6 HP more power than Toyota Starlet, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Toyota Starlet. Despite the higher power, Ford Escort reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 4.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Starlet is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Escort consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Starlet, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Escort could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Escort consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Starlet. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Escort gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Ford Escort is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Escort is 38 cm longer than the Toyota Starlet, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Escort is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escort is 1.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Starlet, which means Ford Escort can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escort has
|
Toyota Starlet has
| |