Ford Escort 1992 vs Rover 200 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Escort engine produces 28 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Ford Escort reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.9 | |
|
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escort consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that by driving the Ford Escort over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Escort gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.40 m | |
| Ford Escort is 12 cm shorter than the Rover 200, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Escort is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 352 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escort is 0.3 metres more than that of the Rover 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escort has
|
Rover 200 has
| |