Ford Escort 1992 vs Seat Toledo 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is a more dynamic driving. Ford Escort engine produces 4 HP less power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Seat Toledo. Due to the lower power, Ford Escort reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.3 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escort consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Escort could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.42 m | |
| Ford Escort is 22 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Escort is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 750 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford Escort has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford Escort, so Ford Escort quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escort has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |