Ford Escort 1992 vs Rover 200 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 NM | 122 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Escort engine produces 21 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Ford Escort reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.1 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escort consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Escort could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.40 m | |
| Ford Escort is 12 cm shorter than the Rover 200, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Escort is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 352 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escort is 0.3 metres more than that of the Rover 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 750 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Rover 200 has
| |