Ford Escort 1992 vs Seat Toledo 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 101 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.7 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is a more dynamic driving. Ford Escort engine produces 15 HP less power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Seat Toledo. Due to the lower power, Ford Escort reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.3 | |
|
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escort consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Ford Escort over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Escort gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.42 m | |
| Ford Escort is 22 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Escort is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 700 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford Escort has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford Escort, so Ford Escort quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escort has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |