Ford Escort 1995 vs Volkswagen Polo 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.8 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 105 HP | 60 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 109 - 178 NM | 116 - 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 17.7 seconds | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 8.9 | 4.9 - 9.0 | |
|
Ford Escort petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Ford Escort equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Escort is larger, but lower. Ford Escort is 15 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Escort is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 762 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escort is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Ford Escort can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`050 | ~ 1`501 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escort has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |