Ford Escort 1995 vs Renault Megane 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.8 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 115 HP | 65 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 109 - 178 NM | 114 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 17.7 seconds | 8.9 - 17.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 8.9 | 5.2 - 7.7 | |
|
Ford Escort petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. On average, Ford Escort equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Escort is smaller. Ford Escort is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Escort is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 348 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1210 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escort is 1.3 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Ford Escort can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`050 | ~ 1`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escort has
|
Renault Megane has
| |