Ford Escort 1995 vs Renault Clio 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.8 | 1.1 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 115 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 109 - 178 NM | 93 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 17.7 seconds | 9.6 - 15.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 8.9 | 5.2 - 7.6 | |
|
Ford Escort petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Ford Escort equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Escort is larger, but lower. Ford Escort is 37 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Escort is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escort is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`050 | ~ 1`498 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 6.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escort has
|
Renault Clio has
| |