Citroen C5 2012 vs Jaguar XF 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Citroen C5 engine produces 4 HP more power than Jaguar XF, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.2 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C5 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1340 km in combined cycle | |
| 1510 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Citroen C5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen C5 is smaller. Citroen C5 is 18 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 540 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Citroen C5 has 101 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`231 kg | 2`320 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`731 kg | 1`735 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 500 kg | 585 kg | |
| Citroen C5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Jaguar XF. Therefore, Jaguar XF is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |