Citroen C5 2010 vs Mazda 6 2010

 
Citroen C5
2010 -
Mazda 6
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 112 HP129 HP
Torque: 240 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 seconds10.7 seconds
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen C5 engine produces 17 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.05.2
Citroen C5 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Citroen C5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 71 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1420 km in combined cycle1230 km in combined cycle
1610 km on highway1450 km on highway
Citroen C5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.76 m
Width: 1.86 m1.80 m
Height: 1.46 m1.44 m
Citroen C5 is larger.
Citroen C5 is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 7 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C5 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 439 litres519 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Citroen C5 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. This could mean that the Citroen C5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0412`065
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

average
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C5 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 54004400
Pros and Cons: Citroen C5 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv