Citroen C5 2010 vs Skoda Superb 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 112 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C5 engine produces 28 HP less power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Skoda Superb. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
The Citroen C5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C5 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Citroen C5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C5 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1420 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
1610 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
1220 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen C5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Citroen C5 2010 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C5 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.78 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Citroen C5 is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 565 litres | |
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Citroen C5 has 126 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`041 | 2`117 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C5 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 5000 | 17 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |