Citroen C5 2010 vs Volvo XC70 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C5 engine produces 77 HP less power than Volvo XC70, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Volvo XC70. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.4 | |
|
The Volvo XC70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C5 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Peugeot 407, Citroen C4 | Used also on Volvo XC60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Citroen C5 2010 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Citroen C5 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Citroen C5 is smaller. Citroen C5 and Volvo XC70 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
|
Volvo XC70 has more luggage space. Citroen C5 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`326 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |