Citroen C5 2010 vs Volvo V70 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C5 engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.2 | |
|
The Volvo V70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C5 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1340 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.55 m | |
| Citroen C5 and Volvo V70 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Citroen C5 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`326 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Citroen C5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V70 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen C5, so Citroen C5 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |