Citroen C5 2010 vs Subaru Outback 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C5 engine produces 12 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.3 | |
|
The Subaru Outback is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C5 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Peugeot 407, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Legacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen C5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Citroen C5 2010 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Citroen C5 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Citroen C5 is larger, but lower. Citroen C5 is 4 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C5 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 526 litres | |
|
Subaru Outback has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C5 has 21 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Outback. This could mean that the Citroen C5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Subaru Outback, which means Citroen C5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`326 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |