Citroen C5 2010 vs Volvo V60 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C5 engine produces 52 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 4.5 | |
|
The Volvo V60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C5 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Peugeot 407, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo XC60, Volvo V40 Cross Country, Volvo S90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo V60 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen C5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Citroen C5 2010 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Citroen C5 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Citroen C5 is larger. Citroen C5 is 7 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 1 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C5 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 529 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1364 litres | |
|
Volvo V60 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C5 has 24 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V60. This could mean that the Citroen C5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`326 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 24 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |