Citroen C5 2008 vs Volvo V70 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C5 engine produces 102 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.4 | |
|
The Volvo V70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C5 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Citroen C5 2008 2.0 engine: The Peugeot EW10A (RFJ) is a 2.0-liter naturally aspirated gasoline engine introduced in 2005 as an updated version of the older EW10J4, adapted to meet Euro 4 emissions standards. In general, the engine is considered fairly reliable and uncomplicated for its class, with relatively low repair costs and good overall durability when maintained ... More about Citroen C5 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.54 m | |
| Citroen C5 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo V70, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C5 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1462 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Citroen C5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V70. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`224 kg | 2`410 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`619 kg | 1`806 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 605 kg | 604 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volvo V70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C5 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo V70, so Volvo V70 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |