Citroen C5 2008 vs Volvo V70 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C5 engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
| By specification Citroen C5 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Citroen C5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C5 2008 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Citroen C5 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.54 m | |
| Citroen C5 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo V70, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C5 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C5 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. This could mean that the Citroen C5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`326 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volvo V70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C5 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volvo V70, so Volvo V70 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |