Citroen C5 2008 vs Honda Accord 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Honda Accord is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C5 engine produces 2 HP less power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Honda Accord. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C5 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C5 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Peugeot 407, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda CR-V, Honda Civic, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen C5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Citroen C5 is larger. Citroen C5 is 8 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 10 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C5 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1657 litres | |
|
Honda Accord has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C5 has 67 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. This could mean that the Citroen C5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda Accord, which means Citroen C5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`326 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Citroen C5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Citroen C5, so Citroen C5 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 9.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Honda Accord has
| |