Citroen C5 2006 vs Rover 75 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C5 engine produces 57 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.8 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C5 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Citroen C5 is smaller, but higher. Citroen C5 is 3 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C5 is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 563 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1222 litres | |
|
Citroen C5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C5 has 163 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Rover 75 has
| |