Citroen C5 2004 vs Rover 75 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C5 engine produces 20 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 54 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.9 | |
| Citroen C5 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Citroen C5 is smaller, but higher. Citroen C5 is 3 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C5 is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1222 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Rover 75, which means Citroen C5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Rover 75 has
| |