Citroen C5 2004 vs BMW 3 series 2003

	Citroen C5 2004 - 2005	BMW 3 series 2003 - 2005
Gearbox:	Automatic	Automatic
Engine:	2.2 Diesel	2.0 Diesel
Performance
Power:	136 HP	115 HP
Torque:	314 NM	280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	11.3 seconds	11.3 seconds
	Citroen C5 engine produces 21 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 34 NM more than BMW 3 series.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	7.1	6.8
	Citroen C5 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:	66 litres	63 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	920 km in combined cycle	920 km in combined cycle
	1200 km on highway	1140 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type
Wheel drive type:	Front wheel drive (FWD)	Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions
Length:	4.76 m	4.48 m
Width:	1.77 m	1.74 m
Height:	1.52 m	1.41 m
	Citroen C5 is larger. Citroen C5 is 28 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C5 is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:	no data	435 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	no data	1345 litres
Turning diameter:	12.5 meters	no data
Gross weight (kg):	1`300	2`005

Safety:
Quality:	below average	low
	Citroen C5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen C5, so Citroen C5 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€):	1600	2400
Pros and Cons:	Citroen C5 has more power higher safety fewer faults lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Citroen C5 2004 vs BMW 3 series 2003

Performance

Fuel consumption

Drive type

Dimensions