Citroen C5 2004 vs Rover 75 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C5 engine produces 22 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Citroen C5 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C5 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Citroen C5 is smaller, but higher. Citroen C5 is 3 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C5 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1222 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
| |