Citroen C5 2004 vs Rover 75 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 138 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
Citroen C5 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C5 engine produces 18 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.8 | |
The Citroen C5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C5 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that by driving the Citroen C5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
1320 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
Citroen C5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C5 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Peugeot 407, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Rover 25, Rover 45 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Citroen C5 2004 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Citroen C5 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.79 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.42 m | |
Citroen C5 is smaller, but higher. Citroen C5 is 3 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C5 is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1222 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`980 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
| |