Citroen C5 2004 vs Renault Laguna 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 138 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Citroen C5 engine produces 18 HP more power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Renault Laguna. Despite the higher power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C5 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C5 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
1320 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
1010 km with real consumption | 1120 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C5 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Peugeot 407, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Citroen C5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Citroen C5 2004 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Citroen C5 2004 2.0 engine Renault Laguna 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Laguna 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.44 m | |
Citroen C5 is larger. Citroen C5 is 6 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C5 is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Citroen C5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Citroen C5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Citroen C5, so Citroen C5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |