Citroen C5 2004 vs Rover 75 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C5 engine produces 23 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.8 | |
| Citroen C5 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 407, Citroen C4, Citroen C4 Picasso | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Rover 25, Rover 45 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Citroen C5 2004 2.0 engine: The Peugeot EW10A (RFJ) is a 2.0-liter naturally aspirated gasoline engine introduced in 2005 as an updated version of the older EW10J4, adapted to meet Euro 4 emissions standards. In general, the engine is considered fairly reliable and uncomplicated for its class, with relatively low repair costs and good overall durability when maintained ... More about Citroen C5 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Citroen C5 is smaller, but higher. Citroen C5 is 3 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C5 is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 563 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1658 litres | 1222 litres | |
|
Citroen C5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C5 (by 436 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`027 kg | 1`980 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`427 kg | 1`450 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 600 kg | 530 kg | |
| Citroen C5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Rover 75. Therefore, Citroen C5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
| |