Citroen C5 2004 vs Rover 75 2004

 
Citroen C5
2004 - 2005
Rover 75
2004 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.7 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 117 HP120 HP
Torque: 160 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.3 seconds12.2 seconds
Rover 75 is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen C5 engine produces 3 HP less power than Rover 75, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.97.8
Citroen C5 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
1100 km on highway1060 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Rover 75 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 407, Citroen Xsara PicassoInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Rover 25, Rover 45
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Rover 75 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.79 m
Width: 1.77 m1.78 m
Height: 1.52 m1.39 m
Citroen C5 is smaller, but higher.
Citroen C5 is 3 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C5 is 13 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data400 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1222 litres
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`980
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 16001600
Pros and Cons:
    Rover 75 has
    • more dynamic
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv