Citroen C5 2004 vs Nissan X-Trail 2005

 
Citroen C5
2004 - 2005
Nissan X-Trail
2005 - 2007
Body: Estate car / wagonCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.7 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 117 HP140 HP
Torque: 160 NM192 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.3 seconds10.3 seconds
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen C5 engine produces 23 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.99.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.2 l/100km10.1 l/100km
The Citroen C5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen C5 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Citroen C5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C5 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail.
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
1100 km on highway810 km on highway
800 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption
Citroen C5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C5 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years12 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 407, Citroen Xsara PicassoInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Primera, Nissan Serena, Nissan Sentra
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Citroen C5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.51 m
Width: 1.77 m1.76 m
Height: 1.52 m1.68 m
Citroen C5 is larger, but lower.
Citroen C5 is 25 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 1 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C5 is 16 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data410 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1841 litres
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Citroen C5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5002`000
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Nissan X-Trail has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen C5, so Nissan X-Trail quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 16002600
Pros and Cons: Citroen C5 has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Nissan X-Trail has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv