Citroen C5 2006 vs Rover 75 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C5 engine produces 6 HP less power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Rover 75. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.8 | |
|
The Citroen C5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C5 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that by driving the Citroen C5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen C5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Citroen C5 is smaller, but higher. Citroen C5 is 3 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C5 is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 563 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1222 litres | |
|
Citroen C5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C5 has 163 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Rover 75 has
| |