Citroen C5 2003 vs Mercedes C class 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 317 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C5 engine produces 21 HP more power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 67 NM more than Mercedes C class. Thanks to more power Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.7 | |
| Citroen C5 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that by driving the Citroen C5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Citroen C5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen C5 is larger. Citroen C5 is 22 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C5 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 1.7 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class, which means Citroen C5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Citroen C5 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mercedes C class, so Citroen C5 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |