Citroen C5 2001 vs Mazda 3 2011

 
Citroen C5
2001 - 2002
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 143 HP150 HP
Torque: 192 NM191 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.4 seconds
Citroen C5 engine produces 7 HP less power than Mazda 3, but torque is 1 NM more than Mazda 3.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.76.7
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Citroen C5 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 could require 150 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1030 km on highway
Mazda 3 2011 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages.

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.46 m
Width: 1.77 m1.76 m
Height: 1.52 m1.47 m
Citroen C5 is larger.
Citroen C5 is 30 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C5 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1360 litres
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Citroen C5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`835
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

high
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C5 has serious deffects in 460 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8005000
Pros and Cons: Citroen C5 has
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv