Citroen C5 2001 vs Mazda 3 2011
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 192 NM | 191 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Citroen C5 engine produces 7 HP less power than Mazda 3, but torque is 1 NM more than Mazda 3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.7 | |
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C5 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
1060 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
Mazda 3 2011 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.46 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
Citroen C5 is larger. Citroen C5 is 30 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C5 is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 340 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1360 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Citroen C5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`835 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | high | |
Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C5 has serious deffects in 460 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 5000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |